Quanitative Research Method Paper Proposal Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Quanitative Method Paper - Research Proposal Exampleg on a number of endogenous and exogenous variables such as employers preferences, employees willingness to accept such relationships and even time related economic pressures such as the current global economic recession.The strategic competition has compelled organizations to resume far reaching policy changes on employee relations with refers to both its operational strategy and the mission related corporate governance principles in order to get through horizontal and vertical synergies which is associated with its organizational goals and objectives. Therefore the limitations that have cropped up against government and institutional efforts to curtail informal individualization of the trading relationship are many.The publications review of this dissertation is based on the theoretical constructs, conceptual paradigms and empirical evidence. The legal relationship between the employer and the employee defines the very essenc e of the employment relationship (Healy, 1999). further it has been pointed out by critics that the existing labor legislation and social security provisions do not adequately cover up the requirements of employees. In feature the employment relationship has become more or less an individual stagement devoid of universal contractual obligations as found in international Labor Organizations (ILO) documents. This phenomenon has acquired a new dimension under different disguises and ruses adopted by employers and imposed on unsuspecting employees. The former tends to arrange an individualistic relationship with the latter on the basis of immediate benefits of employment while the latter agrees more or less due to personal compulsions. disrespect the general vagueness of many labor laws and social security provisions in the US employers have got in to recruitment drives with the intention of sign in employment contracts on this particular premise, i.e. they come to a mutual agreemen t on their individual understanding of the law. For